Top Democrats Demand Answers on Independent Foreclosure Review Process
Waters, Warren, Cummings Call on OCC, Fed to Release Information on Mortgage Servicing Settlement
strongIn the absence of a long-promised public report, leading Democratic Members of Congress have called on federal regulators to disclose critically important information related to the Independent Foreclosure Review (IFR) process for 14 mortgage servicers and the $9.3 billion settlement that abruptly replaced it in January of this year.
In a letter to Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke and Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry, Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Congressman Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, noted the importance of this information to assess the adequacy of the terms and the amount of the settlement, as well as to understand what reforms may still be needed in the mortgage servicing industry
The Democrats reiterated their concerns over the decision to conclude the IFR process before all borrower requests for review and file sampling had been satisfied. They requested the report, as promised in April 2013, as well as answers to a number of specific inquiries. These included a summary of the financial remediation received by borrowers to date, a description of information that has been and will be released to borrowers whose foreclosure files were examined, and information on cases referred to the Department of Justice on suspicion of criminal activities, among others.
The lawmakers requested the Fed and OCC provide this information by no later than the end of the year.
“This information is critically important to addressing the continuing foreclosure processing problems in the mortgage servicing industry,” the letter reads. “An August 2013 [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau] report found that ‘sloppy account transfers,’ ‘poor payment processing,’ and ‘loss mitigation mistakes’ are still harming borrowers. Although the IFR process may be over, there are still many valuable lessons to be learned from it.”
In 2011, the Federal Reserve and the OCC entered into consent agreements with 14 mortgage servicers regarding their unsafe and unsound residential mortgage loan servicing and foreclosure processing practices. These agreements established the IFR process, which required the servicers to hire outside consultants to examine foreclosures to determine whether there had been illegal or improper practices and take remediation steps. On January 7, 2013, the Fed and the OCC announced settlements with many of the servicers, which resulted in a termination of the case-by-case review required under the IFR process, which led to servicers paying $9.3 billion in “cash payments and other assistance” to borrowers, including $3.6 billion in direct payments to borrowers who had homes in foreclosure in 2009 or 2010. Today’s letter was a follow up on assurances that these agencies would release a public report on the details of the Independent Foreclosure Review (IFR) process.
Full text of the letter is below. A signed copy can be viewed at http://1.usa.gov/1edGTJk.
November 18, 2013
The Honorable Ben S. Bernanke The Honorable Thomas J. Curry
Dear Chairman Bernanke and Comptroller Curry:
We write today to follow up on your agencies’ assurances that they would release a public report on the Independent Foreclosure Review (IFR) process.
In April 2011, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) entered into consent agreements with 14 mortgage servicers regarding their unsafe and unsound residential mortgage loan servicing and foreclosure processing practices. Those consent orders required mortgage servicers to establish Action Plans outlining how they would correct deficiencies in their systems relating to loan modifications, communicating with borrowers, and complying with local, state, and federal foreclosure laws. Additionally, the consent orders established the Independent Foreclosure Review (IFR) process, which required the mortgage servicers to hire outside consultants to examine foreclosures initiated in 2009 and 2010, investigate whether borrowers had been the victims of illegal or improper practices, and remediate issues accordingly.
On January 7, 2013, the Board and the OCC announced settlements with many of the mortgage servicers subject to the April 2011 consent orders, which resulted in a termination of the case-by-case review required under the IFR process. On February 28, 2013, the Board and the OCC executed formal amendments to the consent orders under which these servicers agreed to pay $9.3 billion in “cash payments and other assistance” to borrowers, including $3.6 billion in direct payments to borrowers who had homes in foreclosure in 2009 or 2010. Staff for the Board and the OCC indicated that approximately 105,000 out of a possible 4.2 million borrower files had been reviewed at the time that the Board and the OCC finalized the majority of these settlements.
We have raised significant concerns about the decision to conclude the IFR process before all borrower requests for review had been satisfied and randomly selected samples of eligible loan files had been reviewed. Based on the information provided to us at the time of the settlements, we could not assess whether the settlement amount and terms were adequate, whether it was appropriate for the mortgage servicers themselves to decide how to compensate the borrowers they harmed, and whether the outside consultants hired by the servicers collected and analyzed accurate information.
Nonetheless, the Board and the OCC moved forward with the settlement processes and promised Congress that information relating to the IFR process would be forthcoming. In April 2013, Daniel Stipano, Deputy Chief Counsel at the OCC, testified before the Senate Banking Committee that “we do anticipate doing public reporting” on the lessons learned from the IFR. Similarly, Chairman Bernanke testified before the same Committee in July 2013 that “we hope to have a report on this whole thing within the next couple of months that will lay out basically all the information we have” and that “we will try to provide as much transparency as we have.”
This information is critically important to addressing the continuing foreclosure processing problems in the mortgage servicing industry. An August 2013 CFPB report found that “sloppy account transfers,” “poor payment processing,” and “loss mitigation mistakes” are still harming borrowers. Although the IFR process may be over, there are still many valuable lessons to be learned from it.
We request that you provide this information as soon as possible, but no later than the end of the 2013 calendar year. We look forward to continuing to work with you on this issue and thank you for your consideration of this request.